Have you checked the main website?
The answers to many questions are there!


Pavingexpert
The Brew Cabin
Paving, Drainage and
Hard-landscaping in
Britain and Ireland

Search Members Help

Welcome Guest [ Log In :: Register ]

ruler

 

[ Track this topic :: Email this topic :: Print this topic ]

reply to topic start new topic
Topic: Covering drainage cells, Slabs on top of cells, is it a good idea< Next Oldest | Next Newest >
Granitechops
Offline

Apprentice




Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: Sep. 2017
Posted: 06 Dec. 2017,21:52 QUOTE

I am installing 3 attenuation cells under my new block paving drive, is it appropriate to cover the tops (500mm wide) with a line of 5 in No. 600 x 600 x 38mm paving slabs before back filling, this could reduce the depth of hole dug, reduce disposal, & amount of backfill required. ( I do have a tendancy to do 'belts & braces') and the working space available is very limited. The vehicle using the drive will be a 3.5 t. transit. Or would it have consequences I haven't thought of?

--------------
Don.
Back to top
Profile Personal Message 
Tony McC
Offline

Site Agent




Group: Moderator
Posts: 10451
Joined: July 2004
Posted: 09 Dec. 2017,10:49 QUOTE

How does the use of flimsy 38mm flags reduce the dig depth?

The usual spec is for a minimum 500mm of cover over and above the geo-textile wrap. Now, if you're using a typical block paving spec, you'd have 250mm (or thereabouts) in the build-up, so the extra 250mm is simply additional capping which will help ensure the stability of the paving over the attenuation cells.

If your plan was to put the wafer flags over the geo-textile (they would need a sand cushion at the very least to minimise rip risk) and then the 250mm build-up, I'd be concerned that any movement of the flags as the structure beds-in over the first few months, would be reflected through to the pavement surface.

There are sound engineering reasons why the typical spec is for 500mm cover, so to reduce that with a standard crate could be asking for trouble. There *are* shallow crate systems that act as a virtual sub-base replacement (see here) but they are engineered to be used at shallower depths and so are stucturally stronger than standard crates.

Further, by reducing the overall depth of the crate, you could be compromising its efficacy: will you have sufficient penetration of the free-draining sub-layers of the ground?

Personally, for the sake of 250mm, I'd rather play safe and do the job properly....but the choice is yours.


--------------
Site Agent - Pavingexpert
Back to top
Profile Personal Message WEB 
1 replies since 06 Dec. 2017,21:52 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >

[ Track this topic :: Email this topic :: Print this topic ]

 
reply to topic start new topic
Quick Reply: Covering drainage cells

Do you wish to enable your signature for this post?
Do you wish to enable emoticons for this post?
Track this topic
View All Emoticons
View iB Code


ruler

ruler